Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a stunning twist that has sent shockwaves through the hallowed halls of the Capitol, a recently published government-funded study has unveiled a truth so alarming that it has left political pundits and constitutional scholars alike scratching their heads in disbelief.

The study, conducted by the esteemed Institute for Research in the Obvious (IRO), has discovered that the Constitution, that venerable document upon which our nation was founded, may not actually guarantee our inalienable rights as previously thought. In fact, the report suggests that these rights are contingent upon the whims of the economy, the accuracy of scientific research, and the political climate of the day.

"It's a bombshell," exclaimed Dr. Obvious, lead author of the study. "We've always been told that rights like freedom of speech and the right to bear arms are sacrosanct, etched in stone by the Founding Fathers. But our research indicates that these rights are as volatile as the stock market, subject to the same ebbs and flows as the price of Bitcoin."

The study, which cost taxpayers an arm and a leg (or at least a small portion of their annual tax refund), found that each year, the rights enshrined in the Constitution are subject to a complex algorithm that takes into account the GDP growth rate, the latest Nobel Prize-winning scientific discovery, and the current political polls.

For instance, the right to free speech is found to be most robust during times of economic prosperity, when the GDP is above 3%. However, during a recession, this right is reduced by a factor of the unemployment rate, leading to a situation where "free speech" becomes a euphemism for the ability to whisper your concerns without being evicted.

The right to bear arms, according to the study, is directly proportional to the latest advancements in firearm technology. "If scientists invent a new type of smart gun that can differentiate between intruders and lawful owners, the right to bear arms diminishes," Dr. Obvious explained. "Conversely, if a study comes out showing that more guns lead to less crime, the right to bear arms increases exponentially."

The political climate, it seems, has the most immediate impact on our constitutional rights. The study revealed that during an election year, the Constitution is subject to a "dynamic adjustment factor" that reflects the shifting alliances and mudslinging of the campaign trail. "This means that the more outrageous the political ads, the more vulnerable our rights become," Dr. Obvious warned.

In light of these findings, the government has proposed a series of measures to "stabilize" the Constitution, including the creation of a new federal agency dedicated to monitoring economic indicators, scientific breakthroughs, and political sentiment on a 24/7 basis. The agency, to be named the Bureau of Constitutional Integrity (BCI), will allegedly ensure that our rights remain intact, no matter the circumstances.

Critics of the study and the proposed BCI argue that this is a blatant overreach by the government, an attempt to control and manipulate the very document that was meant to limit government power. "It's like putting a band-aid on a gunshot wound," said Constitutional Scholar John Bill-of-Rights. "The Constitution was meant to be a steadfast pillar of liberty, not a fragile toy that breaks under the slightest pressure."

As the nation grapples with this newfound knowledge, one thing is clear: the future of our rights is as uncertain as the weather in Washington, D.C. But rest assured, the government is on it. They've hired the best minds money can buy to figure out how to make our rights as stable as a politician's promise. God bless America, and God help us all.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.