Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a stunning turn of events that has left political pundits and the global community scratching their heads, the United States House of Representatives has been embroiled in a heated debate over a piece of legislation that proposes to define and regulate the freedomm to sneeze'. Yes, you read that right.

The bill, affectionately dubbed the 'Sneezer's Bill of Rights', has sparked a firestorm of controversy, with lawmakers from both sides of the aisle donning hazmat suits and brandishing hand sanitizer as they clash over the implications of government intervention in such a personal and, until now, uncharted territory.

Proponents of the bill, led by the charismatic and somewhat sneezy Representative Hank "Snotshot" Snivelburg, argue that the freedom to sneeze without repercussion is a fundamental human right that must be protected at all costs. "It's a matter of personal liberties," Snivelburg proclaimed from the House floor, his voice muffled by a surgical mask. "The government has no business telling a man when or how he can express his bodily autonomy. If a sneeze is coming, let it come!"

On the other side, a coalition of lawmakers, including the ever-dignified Senator "No-Nose" Nayland and his "Anti-Achoo" Alliance, have denounced the bill as a frivolous and potentially dangerous overreach. "We're at the brink of a global powder keg," Nayland warned, his voice steady and his nose as clear as the crystal clear motives behind his opposition. "The last thing we need is a domestic policy that could be seen as an act of biological warfare. Can't we focus on more pressing issues, like the freedom to deny climate change or the freedom to tweet at 3 AM?"

As the debate rages on, experts have weighed in from all sides, including the surprisingly vocal American Tissue Association, which has called for a balanced approach that respects individual rights while also considering the societal impact of unregulated sneezing. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization has issued a statement expressing confusion and concern over the potential for this legislation to disrupt international relations, potentially leading to a global sneezing pandemic.

In a rare display of bipartisan unity, both parties have agreed to a moment of silence before the vote, not out of respect for the issue at hand, but to ensure that no one accidentally triggers a cascade of contagious sneezes on the chamber floor.

As the clock ticks down, the world waits with bated breath for the outcome of this unprecedented legislative battle, wondering if the freedom to sneeze will indeed become the new frontier in the fight for personal freedoms, or if this is all just a sneezy distraction from the real issues at hand. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the next few days in Washington are guaranteed to be anything but a stuffy affair.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.