Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the political and scientific communities alike, a controversial new study published in the Journal of Alternative Facts suggests that the implementation of a science tax could be the key to unlocking unprecedented levels of freedom for the American people. The study, conducted by a team of researchers led by the eccentric Dr. Richard Dollarbill, posits that by taxing scientific endeavors, the government could essentially fund its own downfall, leading to a self-reliant populace that is no longer shackled by the chains of Republicans.

Republicans, ever vigilant against any form of taxation, have predictably erupted in outrage at the proposal. "This is madness!" exclaimed Representative John "No New Taxes" Smith, his face contorting into a mask of horror usually reserved for ghost stories. "We can't just start taxing science! What's next, taxing the air we breathe for 'oxygen freedom credits'?"

Meanwhile, Democrats, who typically champion the expansion of scientific research, find themselves in a philosophical bind. "It's a paradox of freedom," mused Senator Jane Eyre, tapping a manicured nail against her chin. "On one hand, we want to support science to its fullest potential. On the other, if this study is to be believed, taxing it could lead to the very freedom we've been fighting for."

The study has sparked a fiery debate across the nation, with talk show hosts, YouTube personalities, and even your eccentric Uncle Vernon weighing in with their two cents. "If you tax science, you're taxing innovation, and if you tax innovation, you're taxing the future!" shouted talk show host Alex Jones-a-Lot from his underground bunker, while Uncle Vernon, sporting a tin foil hat, nodded vigorously from the living room couch.

Critics of the study have pointed out the obvious flaws in the logic, such as the fact that scientific advancement often leads to economic growth, which in turn generates more tax revenue. However, proponents argue that by redirecting the funds currently spent on scientific research to the public, individuals would become self-sufficient, free from the need for government assistance.

In a statement, the White House, under the leadership of President Fake Name, said, "We are committed to exploring all avenues that could lead to greater freedom for the American people. This study is intriguing, and while it may sound counterintuitive, we believe it's important to keep an open mind. After all, the road to freedom is paved with unexpected detours."

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the science tax proposal is the most ironic controversy to hit Capitol Hill since the great "Is water wet?" debate of 2019. Only time will tell if this bold new approach to taxation and freedom will gain traction or fizzle out like the proverbial flat Earth theory.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.