Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In an explosive revelation that has left the nation's capital in a tailspin, a high-ranking insider has come forward with claims that the recent Supreme Court nominee's controversial past was not merely a series of unfortunate life choices, but a calculated move in a grand political chess game.

The insider, who has chosen to remain anonymous for fear of retribution from what they're calling the "Shadow Senate," claims that the nominee, Judge Judgepants, was selected based on an algorithm that predicts public outrage and media sensationalism. "It's all about creating the perfect storm of scandal and controversy to keep the public engaged and the opposition parties at each other's throats," the source explained, sipping a cup of coffee that suspiciously resembled political intrigue.

According to the insider, the strategy was devised by a clandestine think tank known as the United Statess of America Incorporated" (USAI), a group of political scientists and marketing gurus who have allegedly been orchestrating elections and public opinion since the dawn of the internet. "They've got their fingers on the pulse of America, tapping into every keyboard warrior's deepest fears and aspirations," the source continued, their eyes darting around the room as if expecting the walls to have ears.

The plan, as laid out in the infamous "Project Outrage," was to nominate a candidate with a colorful past, ensuring that media outlets would be unable to resist the clickbait potential of the judge's scandalous history. "It's a masterstroke of political strategy," the insider chuckled. "The more the media scrutinizes, the more the public is hooked. It's like a reality TV show, but with real consequences for the nation's judicial system."

As the news of this strategy broke, politicians from both sides of the aisle were quick to condemn the tactic, feigning outrage and calling for integrity and transparency in the selection process. However, many political observers have pointed out that this is the same group that brought us the "Art of the Deal" and "Hope and Change," so perhaps it's all just part of the grand game of politics.

In the end, the question remains: Is Judge Judgepants the puppet of a political power play, or is he merely a pawn in a game where the lines between right and wrong have been so finely blurred that even the players can't tell the difference? Only time will tell if this scandal will rock the foundations of the United States, or if it's just another day in the circus that is American politics.

In the meantime, the public is advised to maintain a healthy skepticism of any Supreme Court nominee who appears to have more baggage than a touring rock band. After all, in politics, your past is often the only predictor of your future—unless, of course, you're playing 4D chess with the fate of the Supreme Court.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.