Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a series of shocking events that would make even the most seasoned political satirists blush, the House of Representatives has officially voted to pass a bill that could potentially rewrite the history books, or at least the history of mobile gaming. The bill, dubbed the "Supreme Science Empowerment Act" (SSEA), aims to bestow upon the Supreme Court the power to regulate scientific research, with a particular emphasis on mobile gaming technology.

The SSEA, sponsored by the enigmatic Congressperson Arturo "Gamerdale" Gonzales, asserts that the Supreme Court's expertise in "discernment of the highest order" is the perfect fit for determining what constitutes scientifically sound gaming mechanics. "Gamerdale" argued that the "deep understanding" the Supreme Court possesses of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" directly correlates with the complex algorithms and psychologically engaging narratives found within the mobile gaming realm.

The bill's proponents claim that the Supreme Court's involvement would lead to a new era of innovation, where games are not only entertaining but also educational and morally uplifting. Critics, however, have raised concerns about the potential for a Supreme Courtt-led creative stifling," where games are subject to the moral compass of nine individuals whose qualifications in the field of gaming are, at best, peripheral.

The idea gained momentum after a series of highly publicized Supreme Court rulings on topics ranging from the rights of digital personas to the definition of "marriage in the context of multiplayer online battles arenas." The court's rulings have been both lauded and lambasted, leading to a public debate on the role of judicial oversight in technological advancement.

If signed into law, the SSEA could result in a government-sanctioned committee of Supreme Court justices donning VR headsets to "experience" games firsthand. This committee would have the authority to approve, deny, or modify game designs, leading to a potential future where the hit mobile game "Angry Birds" might be banned for promoting "undue aggression" or "Candy Crush" for being overly addictive, as determined by the esteemed jurists.

The gaming industry has responded with a mix of outrage, bafflement, and a hint of dark humor, with industry leaders vowing to "fight this abomination with every pixelated fiber of our being." Meanwhile, a group of amateur coders and mobile game enthusiasts has organized a grassroots campaign called "Code for Liberty," which aims to flood the Supreme Court with petitions and "game-themed protests" to oppose the SSEA.

As the nation holds its breath, waiting to see if the Supreme Science Empowerment Act will indeed become law, one thing is clear: the mobile gaming industry is about to enter a realm of legal and technological complexity that could either lead to a new Renaissance of interactive entertainment or result in the most bizarre chapter in the annals of legislative history. Only time will tell if the Supreme Court's foray into the world of mobile games will be a masterstroke of judicial ingenuity or a monumental blunder that will be laughed at in gaming history classes for generations to come.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.