Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a plot twist more befuddling than the cliffhanger at the end of a season-long TV drama, the Supreme Court has become the unexpected arbiter in a fiery debate that has divided the nation's House of Representatives. At the heart of this powder keg is a controversial scientific theory that threatens to turn the country's understanding of physics on its head.

The theory, proposed by a rogue group of quantum physicists known as the "Quark Quintet," suggests that the traditional concept of "gravity" is nothing more than a cosmic prank played by an all-powerful entity known as "Heisenberg the Hilarious." This assertion has sent shockwaves through the scientific community and the national psyche alike, with many fearing that if true, all apple-related industries would collapse, sending the economy into a tailspin from which not even a fiscal cliff could save it.

The House, typically known for its bipartisan inability to agree on the color of the sky, found a rare moment of unity in their collective confusion. Representatives from both sides of the aisle banded together in a rare display of camaraderie to demand answers from the scientific establishment. "We must stand firm against this assault on apple pie physics!" exclaimed Congressman Newton Gravity, a man whose very name seemed to mock the very principles the Quark Quintet sought to debunk.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court, which has historically steered clear of science sections and lab coats, found itself in the unenviable position of having to weigh in on the matter. Chief Justice Loretta Supreme, donning a lab coat borrowed from her teenage son, presided over heated arguments that ranged from the esoteric to the downright absurd. At one point, a prominent legal scholar argued that if gravity were a cosmic prank, it would violate the fundamental right to fall freely without the government's interference.

As the nation held its collective breath, the Court's decision could potentially reshape the very fabric of reality. On one hand, upholding the Quark Quintet's theory could lead to a utopia where elevator rides are a thing of the past and people could leap from skyscrapers with the promise of a soft landing. On the other hand, dismissing the theory could preserve the current understanding of physics, ensuring that everyone's morning coffee would continue to shatter upon impact with the kitchen floor, much to the dismay of caffeine-dependent lawmakers.

In a move that would make Charles Dickens roll over in his grave, the Court has decided to issue a ruling after the next national disaster, thereby ensuring that the public's attention would be firmly fixed on the spectacle of nature's wrath rather than the whims of quantum theory. "We feel that the timing is perfect," Supreme declared. "Let's let nature decide the fate of gravity. After all, if Heisenberg the Hilarious is pulling strings, who are we to interfere?"

As the nation braces for the Court's decision and the potential for a reality-altering disaster, one thing is clear: the line between science and satire has never been blurrier. And while the future of gravity hangs in the balance, one can't help but wonder if this isn't all one big joke orchestrated by the cosmos with an impeccable sense of humor.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.