Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a shocking turn of events that has left political pundits and history buffs alike scratching their heads, the Supreme Court has made a decision so bold and so outlandish that it's been rumored to rip a hole in the very fabric of American jurisprudence. In a ruling that would make even the most seasoned of founding fathers blush, the Court has decided that every piece of legislation passed in the history of the United States must, from this moment forth, be submitted to a panel of judges who specialize in historical reenactments.

Justice Rufus Scranton, delivering the majority opinion, explained that "in order to truly understand the spirit of the law, one must first immerse themselves in the context in which it was conceived." Therefore, all future legislation must be presented to a team of actors dressed in period-appropriate attire, complete with scripted debates that mirror the original discussions surrounding the law's inception.

The decision, which has been aptly named the "Living History Amendment Act," has sparked outrage and jubilation in equal measure. Proponents argue that this will bring a new level of authenticity and understanding to the legislative process, ensuring that every bill is evaluated on its historical merit rather than its political expediency. Detractors, however, are concerned that this could potentially grind the gears of governance to a halt, as the process of historically authenticating every piece of legislation could take years, if not decades.

In a related development, political strategists are scrambling to adapt to this unprecedented shift in the legislative landscape. Consultancy firms are now offering "Historical Impact Analysis" as a service to politicians, promising to predict how their proposed legislation would fare under the scrutiny of 18th-century parliamentary debate techniques.

Meanwhile, history departments across the nation are celebrating the sudden influx of funding and attention, as experts are sought after to fact-check the actors' performances and ensure the historical accuracy of the reenactments. The first bill to be tested under this new system? The infamous "Tea Act" of 1773, which some believe could set a precedent for future legislative theatre.

As America watches with bated breath, the Supreme Court's decision promises to redefine the very essence of political strategy and the meaning of freedom. Will this new approach to lawmaking breathe life into the democratic process, or will it unravel the fabric of the republic, leaving us all in a historical farce? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: political satire has found its most unlikely muse in the highest court of the land.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.