Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a landmark decision that has sent shockwaves across the nation, the Supreme Court has ruled that law enforcement agencies must obtain a warrant before accessing a citizen's digital bathroom stall history. The ruling, which comes at a time when privacy concerns are at an all-time high, has sparked a fierce debate over the balance between security and freedom in the digital age.

The case, known as "John Smith vs. The United States," began when cyber-sleuth extraordinaire Agent Jane Doe discovered that Mr. Smith had been visiting a series of mysterious digital bathroom stalls, according to court documents obtained by The Onion's legal correspondent. Agent Doe argued that these virtual restrooms were the modern-day equivalent of a secret diary, where individuals could indulge in their most intimate and unfiltered thoughts without fear of judgment.

However, in a stunning rebuke to the government's argument that digital privacy is a thing of the past, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects even the most personal of digital spaces. The decision was praised by privacy advocates, who hailed it as a victory for freedom in the face of an ever-watchful digital eye.

"This is a landmark decision that will shape the future of digital privacy for generations to come," said Futurist Dr. Algorithm, speaking from his personal, encrypted bathroom stall. "It's a clear signal that the Supreme Court understands the importance of maintaining a sense of solitude and freedom, even in a world where our every move is potentially under surveillance."

Critics, however, were quick to condemn the ruling as a step backward for law enforcement, arguing that it would hinder their ability to track down criminals who use digital bathroom stalls to plan their nefarious deeds. "Imagine a dystopian future where criminals can use these digital sanctuaries to conspire without fear of detection," warned Chief Surveillance Officer Dick Butkiss.

In the wake of the decision, the nation grapples with the implications of a world where digital privacy is taken seriously. Advocacy groups for digital bathroom stall users have sprung up, offering legal aid to those who feel their right to virtual seclusion has been violated. Meanwhile, tech companies are scrambling to develop new encryption methods to protect their users' most private digital moments.

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the Supreme Court's decision has not only set a precedent for digital privacy but has also ignited a fiery discussion about what it means to be free in a world where the line between public and private is increasingly blurred. Whether this will lead to a renaissance of personal freedom or a new era of digital surveillance remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the nation's bathroom stalls, both real and digital, have never been more in the spotlight.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.