Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a shocking turn of events that has sent ripples through the halls of academia and the corridors of power, Senator BozoTrumpet has introduced a controversial new political strategy that involves a complete overhaul of the nation's approach to science. The strategy, which has been cryptically referred to as "Operation Brainwash," aims to redefine the way scientific research is conducted and funded, with the ultimate goal of swaying public opinion in favor of a particular political agenda.

According to leaked documents, the strategy involves the creation of a new Senate committee, the "Science Oversight and Public Influence Subcommittee" (SOPIS), which will have the power to approve or deny funding for any research project that it deems "non-compliant" with national political interests. The subcommittee's chair, Senator FactTwister, has been quoted as saying, "We're not against science, we're for science that serves the American people, and what better way to ensure that than to have a say in what gets researched and what doesn't?"

The scientific community has erupted in protest, with leading researchers and academicians decrying the move as an affront to the principles of objective inquiry and the independence of science. The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has released a statement calling the new strategy "a dangerous precedent that threatens the integrity of our nation's research enterprise."

But the political gamesmanship doesn't end there. Insiders report that the strategy also includes a plan to deploy "Fact Flunkies," a team of lobbyists and social media influencers who will be tasked with promoting research findings that align with the political agenda and discrediting those that do not. These Flunkies are said to be well-funded and highly motivated, with the goal of creating a public narrative that supports the strategy's objectives.

The scientific community is bracing for impact, with many researchers expressing concern that the new strategy will lead to a decline in the quality and diversity of research, as well as a potential chilling effect on scientists who may be reluctant to pursue lines of inquiry that are perceived to be politically sensitive.

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the relationship between politics and science is entering a new, and potentially perilous, phase. The question on everyone's mind is not just what this means for the future of scientific research in the United States, but also what it means for the democratic principles that underpin the integrity of our institutions.

In a world where facts are up for grabs and truth is negotiable, only time will tell if Operation Brainwash will succeed in shaping the national discourse or if the scientific method will prove to be a resilient force against the tides of political influence. Stay tuned as this story develops, and remember: in the age of alternative facts, the pen is mightier than the microscope—but only if it's wielded by someone who knows how to read it.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.