Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a shocking turn of events, renowned political satirist and humorist, Horatio Humorous, has filed a lawsuit against the Supreme Court, claiming that the document upon which the nation's legal system is based, the Constitution, is not funny enough. The lawsuit, which has sent shockwaves through the halls of justice and the corridors of power, argues that the Founding Fathers failed to incorporate adequate humor into the nation's governing charter, thereby violating the First Amendment's protection of free speech and the right to laughter.

Humorous, known for his biting wit and ability to skewer political figures from both sides of the aisle, maintains that the absence of humor in the Constitution is a direct affront to the American people's right to be amused by their leaders and the laws they uphold. "The Framers may have intended to create a 'more perfect Union,' but they clearly overlooked the importance of a good punchline," Humorous quipped during a press conference outside the Supreme Court, where he was dressed in a colonial-era costume complete with knee-high stockings and a tri-cornered hat adorned with a feather quill.

The House of Representatives has called an emergency session to discuss the implications of Humorous's lawsuit on the legislative process and the integrity of the nation's legal document. In a rare display of bipartisan unity, both the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi-Simpson, and the Minority Leader, Kevin McCarthy-Reagan, issued a joint statement expressing their concern over the potential impact on the sanctity of the Constitution. "While we appreciate a good laugh as much as the next person," the statement read, "we must draw the line at compromising the principles upon which this great nation was founded."

Meanwhile, President Joseph Biden-Obama has taken to Twitter to voice his support for the Constitution, tweeting, "The Constitution is not a comedy script. It's a sacred text that has withstood the test of time. Let's not forget that it's the foundation of our democracy, not a joke book." However, his tweet was quickly overshadowed by a meme of himself wearing a "Who let the dogs out?" T-shirt, standing next to a poster of the Constitution with the words "Just Kidding" scribbled across it.

As the nation awaits the Supreme Court's response to Humorous's lawsuit, legal scholars and comedians alike are debating the merits of the case. Some argue that the Constitution, with its checks and balances, separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights, is already a masterpiece of political satire, designed to keep the government in check. Others contend that the document could indeed benefit from a dose of humor to make it more relatable to the average citizen.

In the midst of the debate, Humorous has released a satirical rendition of the Preamble to the Constitution, which begins with, "We the People, in order to form a more perfect Union of Laughs, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Humor."

The nation braces itself for what promises to be a landmark case that could redefine the role of humor in American governance. Whether the Supreme Court will take Humorous's case seriously or find it as amusing as the satirist intends remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the legal system, the political arena, and the public are all in for a very interesting ride.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.