Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the very fabric of American society, the Supreme Court has today unanimously ruled that the government's ability to surveil its citizens is not only a constitutional right but also a necessary tool for maintaining economic stability. The decision, which has been met with a collective gasp from privacy advocates and a celebratory dance from government officials, effectively strips citizens of their "antiquated" right to privacy.

The ruling, which has been cleverly dubbed "The Freedom to Know Every American" act, was penned by the esteemed Justice Alex Supreme, who argued that "the right to privacy has become an obsolete relic of a bygone era, much like flip phones and VCRs." Justice Supreme, flanked by an entourage of robo-lawyers, proclaimed that "the eyes of the government are not cameras, but the ever-watchful gaze of benevolent guardians ensuring the safety and fiscal health of the nation."

In a press conference immediately following the ruling, President Bipartisan Unity, clad in a suit with eavesdropping devices subtly woven into the fabric, stated, "Today marks a new era of transparency and accountability. Americans should feel proud that their government is now free to monitor every aspect of their lives, ensuring that not a single dollar is spent without the watchful gaze of Uncle Sam."

The economy, it seems, was the linchpin in this monumental decision. The Court argued that surveillance is essential for preventing fraud, terrorism, and the misuse of government funds. "Without the ability to monitor citizens, we risk a slippery slope into a dystopian nightmare where the economy collapses under the weight of unchecked criminal activity," said Chief Justice Data Cruncher.

Privacy advocates, now relegated to the fringes of society, have been quick to criticize the decision. "This is a clear violation of our constitutional rights," exclaimed the spokesperson for the group 'We'd Really Like to Use the Bathroom in Peace'. "Who will we turn to when we need a moment of solitude away from the ever-prying eyes of our government?"

As the nation grapples with the implications of this landmark decision, many are left pondering the true meaning of freedom. With the Supreme Court's ruling, it seems that freedom is not just the ability to live without surveillance, but the ability to live under the watchful eye of a government that claims to know what's best for you—economically, socially, and perhaps even personally.

In a final act of solidarity, the Court concluded that any citizen who objects to the new surveillance measures will be granted a special badge signifying their 'opt-out' status, which will be monitored 24/7 to ensure compliance with the new laws. A small price to pay for the utopian vision of a perfectly ordered society, where every action is accounted for, and every decision is made with the nation's best interests at heart.

The Supreme Court's decision has set a precedent that will undoubtedly shape the future of privacy and government surveillance for generations to come. As the nation adjusts to this brave new world, one thing is certain: the eyes of the government are now firmly fixed on the citizens it is sworn to protect.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.