Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the academic community and sparked a political firestorm, documents obtained by our intrepid investigative team at The Onion, a leading journal in the field of satire and humor, have uncovered a covert operation by the United States government to influence the direction of scientific research.

The campaign, code-named "Operation Tomorrow's Truth," was allegedly spearheaded by a shadowy think tank known as the "American Bureau of Intellectual Fabrication" (ABIF), a group with ties to both the "Democrats of Progress" and the "Republicans of Renaissance." The goal, as described in the confidential documents, was to "subtly guide the scientific community towards research that aligns with the strategic interests of the United States, while ensuring that the public remains blissfully unaware of the manipulation."

The documents detail a range of initiatives, including the funding of research that "unequivocally" supports the benefits of genetically modified foods, the promotion of studies that "incontrovertibly" prove the efficacy of a newly patented pharmaceutical, and the discrediting of any scientific findings that might "jeopardize the economic or political standing" of certain powerful entities.

One particularly audacious project involved the creation of a time-traveling scientist, Dr. Temporal Taft, who was sent back to the 19th century to "steer the scientific discourse" and lay the groundwork for today's technological advancements. Dr. Taft's mission was to ensure that the discoveries of the era would be "sufficiently influenced" to pave the way for a future dominated by American innovation and intellectual property rights.

The revelation has sparked a fierce debate among lawmakers, with members of the "Senate Oversight Committee on Scientific Integrity" calling for immediate investigations into the alleged campaign. "If these claims are true," said Senator Prudence Polite, a staunch advocate for scientific transparency, "it represents a grave threat to the integrity of science and the democratic process. We must ensure that our pursuit of knowledge is free from political manipulation and propaganda."

On the other side of the aisle, Representative Clifford Biggs, a staunch defender of "free-market scientific advancement," argued that the government's involvement in shaping scientific research was a "natural extension" of its role in protecting American interests. "After all," he rhetorically questioned, "if we don't advocate for our own scientific agenda, who will?"

As the controversy rages on, the American public is left to ponder the implications of this shadow war being waged in the realm of science. Will the truth ever be truly independent, or is it destined to be shaped by the forces of power and influence? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the future of science, and indeed the future itself, may have been altered in ways we are only beginning to comprehend.

In the meantime, the world watches with bated breath as the United States grapples with the moral and ethical implications of its secret campaign to shape the future of science. Will the pursuit of knowledge be left in the capable hands of scientists, or will it remain a pawn in the geopolitical chess game played by those in power? Only the pages of history, yet to be written, can provide the answer.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.