Impeached 2 is an armchair politician's dream. Play today!

In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, a group of rogue scientists has unveiled a groundbreaking study that could potentially rewrite the very fabric of the U.S. Constitution. The study, conducted in a series of highly controversial experiments, has allegedly proven that the Constitution's foundations are not as solid as previously believed, and that the document may, in fact, be susceptible to the whims of scientific discovery.

The lead researcher, Dr. Emma Arithmetic of the Institute for Advanced Satire, claims to have discovered that the Earth is not, in fact, the center of the universe, but merely an inconsequential speck orbiting an average-sized star in a vast, indifferent cosmos. This revelation, which directly contradicts the long-held Republican belief in the Earth's central importance, has ignited a firestorm of political satire and controversy across the country.

"It's an outrage!" exclaimed Senator Tom Contradict of Virginia, a staunch advocate for Earth-centric policy-making. "We've built our entire legal system on the premise that our planet is the pinnacle of creation. If these scientists are to be believed, then everything we've worked for is just a cosmic joke!"

The study has also cast doubt on the Second Amendment's assertion that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, suggesting that in the vast expanse of the universe, guns might actually be microscopic and incapable of causing harm. This has led to a surge in panic buying among NRA members, who fear that their beloved firearms might soon become invisible to the naked eye.

In response to the scientific upheaval, the Senate has called for an emergency session to discuss potential amendments to the Constitution, including the addition of a new First Amendment right to "free space travel" and the rebranding of the Second Amendment to protect the right to "microscopic weaponry."

Meanwhile, the scientific community has largely dismissed the study as a work of satire, designed to highlight the absurdity of basing laws on outdated scientific understanding. However, for the politically inclined, the study has provided a new battleground, where the war between science and constitutional tradition is fought not in laboratories, but in the court of public opinion.

As the nation grapples with this latest challenge to its foundational documents, one thing is clear: the only thing more controversial than a new scientific discovery is a politician's attempt to interpret it.

Can't get enough of politics? Play Impeached 2 and become President of the U.S. today!

This article was automagically written, and intended only for entertainment purposes.